New federal transportation bill could cut funding for biking and walking projects by up to 60-70 percent

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Washington Bikes now turns to protecting popular job-creating safety projects and programs for growing biking and walking in Washington state

Lost in today’s historic news of the Supreme Court’s Affordable Care Act ruling is the fact that last night at the eleventh hour, conferees from the US House and Senate came to an agreement on a two-year federal transportation bill. On Friday, Congress will vote on this new transportation bill that reverses years of progress on biking and walking policy and cuts by up to 60 to 70 percent funding for local safety projects such as sidewalks, crosswalks, and bike lanes.

The Bicycle Alliance, along with partners nationally are very concerned at the bill’s cuts to funding for popular programs nationwide for Safe Routes to School programs, new sidewalks, and bikeways. At best, programs that previously funded walking and biking will see reduced funding from $1.2 billion per year to only $700 million. Unfortunately, because the new umbrella program called Transportation Alternatives now includes options for states and local governments to use these monies on road projects, and because individual states have the option to opt-out of funding for half of each state’s allocation, the number for walking and biking could dip as low to as $350 million annually.

“This bill means less money for walking and biking and more competition for that money from roads and regulatory projects,” said Washington Bikes statewide policy director Blake Trask. “Not only that, but states can opt-out for up to half of the money. Despite this news, we are optimistic that our leaders from Washington state will continue to invest in these important roadway safety and school programs,” said Trask.

The bill’s 60-70 percent cut in overall funding could mean that only 1% of the transportation budget goes to walking and biking. Given that 14% of all traffic fatalities occur to those on foot and bike, the latest federal funding package will lead to an even larger disparity in the need for safer streets for all roadway users.

“In Washington state, we are lucky that the state has chosen to fund walking and biking more than most states,” said Barbara Culp, executive director of Washington Bikes. She added, “we look forward to working with elected leaders and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to ensure that the state government chooses to opt-in for its allotment of walking and biking monies in the coming years. The Bicycle Alliance will continue to advocate for increased funding and we will continue to collaborate with school districts across the state on the wildly successful and dramatically underfunded Safe Routes to School programs.”

Currently 4 out of every 5 school applicants in Washington state do not receive Safe Routes to School program support due to a lack of funding.

To sum up, the transportation bill:

  • Cuts available walking and biking monies by up to two-thirds
  • Eliminates dedicated Safe Routes to School funding
  • Weakens local control by allowing states to opt-out for half of available walking and biking dollars
  • Makes  biking and walking compete with new expensive programs for roads and environmental mitigation in the now conflated Transportation Alternatives program
###

Contact: Blake Trask
Statewide Policy Director
Washington Bikes
206.310.4762
blake@wabikes.org
This article was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments with the RSS feed for this post. Both comments and trackbacks are closed.

One Comment

  1. Anonymous
    Posted July 7, 2012 at 8:03 pm | Permalink

    It should be noted that both of WA's senators voted for this massive catch-all legislation that included preventing a rise on student loan interest rates. It would be good to know how they communicated this vote, which set bike and pedestrian funding in the wrong direction. I wrote to both about this, and neither responded except with a generic mail about how each were fighting for more federal money coming to transportation projects. I have no idea what either Senator does on this issue or believes for that matter. Rep. McDermott, who also voted for this, wrote me back as well and merely said, I'm on the bike Caucus. I have no idea what that means or what he did on this matter.