![\"Opening](\"http:\/\/wabikes.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/FutureBike2014_Adonia-Lugo_Barb-Chamberlain_Keith-Holt_photo-by-Lindsay-Dill_forweb.jpg\")
<\/a>Opening session at Future Bike 2014, “Inside the Advocate’s Studio”. L-R: Adonia Lugo, PhD, Equity Initiative Manager for the League of American Bicyclists; Barb Chamberlain, Executive Director, Washington Bikes; Keith Holt, Executive Director, Milwaukee Bike Works, and Southeast Region Director, Wisconsin Bicycle Federation. — Photo by Lindsay Dill<\/p><\/div>\n
Yet inclusion is complex. What does it mean to include a much wider range of List One<\/strong> in the ever-growing circle of people who want to make our towns better places to ride a bicycle?<\/p>\n Note what this is not.<\/strong> The list above is not this list:<\/p>\n When you hear equity\u2014diversity\u2014inclusion<\/strong>\u2014you most likely think immediately of List Two. These are (some of the) labels we apply to human characteristics, chosen or inherent or a result of life circumstance, that continue to serve as the basis for various forms of discrimination. (I don\u2019t think either list is exhaustive. What would you add?)<\/p>\n After spending a full week in September 2014 at three different conferences in which issues of equity, diversity, and inclusion were embedded, I would argue that we need to lay List One alongside List Two when we think about why and how to welcome more voices into our work as advocates and activists.<\/p>\n [Tweet “List One\/List Two: Another way to think about equity\/inclusion\/diversity.”]<\/p>\n I\u2019m not calling for doing away with List Two. It matters. When people in any of those List Two categories don\u2019t see others like ourselves, we notice. (And we are ALL represented on List Two, as we are on List One.)<\/p>\n If we have been left out we may work to get more of \u201cus\u201d there, or we may retreat to safer places where we don\u2019t feel so outnumbered. Either way, it\u2019s usually pretty clear when you look, at least for those characteristics that are visible.<\/p>\n List Two, while incomplete, can serve as a shorthand reference for reminding us to think about how List One will broaden our work. When we look around the room and it looks a lot like “us” (whoever that is), we need to remember that we are also missing out on List One.<\/p>\n In a panel at Pro Walk\/Bike\/Place, which immediately preceded Future Bike, Elly Blue drew a distinction between advocates — those who speak on behalf of others — and activists — those who work to draw out and include those others. She noted that we need both in the community of people who care about better places and better bicycling.<\/p>\n I don’t see my work as an either\/or. I cannot do a really good job of speaking for unless I speak with, work with, listen to. At the same time, my privilege places me in a position to “speak for”<\/a> when I’m in a room that isn’t fully inclusive. My mother raised me to believe that’s my obligation as someone who has been very lucky<\/a>.<\/p>\n How do we know when something from List One is missing? How do we hear or see what isn\u2019t there? How do we broaden the circle?<\/p>\n [Tweet “Challenge to bike leaders: Find\/include those who aren’t often seen\/heard.”]<\/p>\n At the end of Future Bike Dr. Adonia Lugo, Equity Initiative Manager for the League of American Bicyclists and a former research associate of Washington Bikes, told us, \u201cYou should leave with more questions than answers.\u201d These are some of my questions. I look forward to answers we create together.<\/p>\n [Tweet “Don’t just check the boxes from List 2. Include people to broaden understanding.”]<\/p>\n <\/p>\nList One<\/h2>\n
\n
List Two<\/h2>\n
\n
Related Reading<\/h3>\n
\n
Selected Tweets in Storify<\/h2>\n